主頁 本書讀者評論選輯我想看來生不做中國人简体字版

Saturday, August 18, 2012

王丹老弟

王丹老弟, 

你也許認識中國,但並不認識香港,對香港錯綜複雜的政壇,還是少講少錯為妙!

祖康敬告

16 Comments:

Anonymous said...

[叫到],你可以唔比面嗎?

Anonymous said...

南非的確有民主,但選了不善統治的人,而某些人佔南非少數,所以選不到善於統治的人。結果南非愈窮,犯罪率高

yahoo answer:
問題:Was South Africa better off under Apartheid? Is it a better nation today?
By "better" I mean mostly about standard of living for its citizens..

問題內容:I watched a documentary the other night and many of the people being interviewed believed life was better under white rule (even the blacks being interviewed).. and that the leaders in place now have done very little besides make themselves rich and the South African blacks are worse off today then they were..

I decided to ask to get some perspective from South Africans. Feel free to eleborate however you wish. thanks

最佳答案:
Only the previously disadvantaged people are better off today, as for SA, not at all, with corruption, name changes, poor service, pathetic education standards and very view people qualified for the job they are doing, it is a recipe for disaster. The sad part is, if you state this view, you are marked as being a racist, and not accepting mixes relationships is a crime??? There is to many cultural and values that is different, so what do you let go of and where do you really belong. People who should be behind bars for crimes they admitted to, it walking free, but the ANC is so proud ot what they achieved, sorry i can just see a once beautiful land falling to pieces, and there is nat a damn thing i can do about it.

Anonymous said...

yahoo answer:
問題:Why was Apartheid opposed by many South Africa and Britain?

問題內容:Can anyone please give me some detailed description, which i can understand and use for my research on Apartheid!

最佳答案:
My husband is a white south African and he grew up in the apartheid, I am British but my farther and grandmother lived in SA in the 1970's. The only way to put this is people living in the apartheid were so much better off everyone had jobs food water, the electric never went off where as nowadays in rural SA the electric frequently stops for over 9 hours a day and the governments answer 'use less electric'. SA Boers were a racist nation yes but for good reasons the uneducated black males are just full of hate for everyone and everything they believe that they can just take whatever they want money property women, during apartheid it was all kept under control by the amazing efforts of groups auch as the AWB and powerful leaders such as Eugene Terrablanch, and everyone was happy and safe no bars on windows no 10ft high security fences jobs for all. After Brittan FORCED the hand over of power to the ANC it ruined the whole country of SA.the ANC is a communists power and any who oppose there rule are murdered. What you wont hear on the news over here is the horrific crimes that are being carried out against the whites and non anc supporters babies and the elderly are being brutally raped and tortured just because they are white but and murder is not allowed to be reported outside SA and the race of the person is not allowed to be disclosed why? because the government makes money of crime LOTS of money and they don’t care about the people to them they are just as easily disposed of. I’m sure the whole world has heard of the farm murders in Zimbabwe? but in SA it is 10Xs worse.
While in SA even the black people say they were much happier under white rule and many many people would be happy with joint power sharing but none will speak out in fear of being killed.
So to answer your question the apartheid was opposed by so many people because they knew what would happen to the country. Brittan forced the apartheid because of 3 main reasons 1 to rid themselves of the guilt of black slavery 2 to keep SA quiet about the horrific torture they put them through in the Boer war (Brittan invented concentration camps during this period forcing the Boer women and children into concentration camps and killing them until the men surrendered and in a war where the boer was only 3000 against Brittan’s 860,000 and they were winning but they could not sacrifice there loved ones its not a Boers way) and 3 to control the diamonds and gold which are abundant in SA.
If you would like to know more just msg me x

忘了我是誰 said...

王丹講左d乜呀?

Anonymous said...

Stormfront標題:Olympics; The Chinese athletes ALL look Chinese...

內容:his is a great opportunity for BUGSing logic.


The athletes from Asian countries all look Asian. The athletes from the African countries all look African. The athletes from White countries look......(I'd best stop there otherwise the anti-Whites will brand me a racistnaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews).

It is because China or Japan or Kenya are not being targeted for GENOCIDE through mass immigration and assimilation, only White people in White countries are.

anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.


Hit some of these you olympic you tube vids, they are getting lots of hits.

It is a good easy one to bring up in discussions in the workplace too, and while they watch more of the games, it will sink in further.

回覆:
Anti-Whites wail about the Tibetan genocide at the hands of the Chinese, but for some reason, no one advocates flooding China with millions and millions of non-Asians, giving them voting rights and special privileges and force-blending them with the Chinese to ”make up for it all.”

No, this is ONLY done in all White countries and the only children affected by it are innocent White children. It is White Genocide.

They say that they're anti-racist; what they are is anti-White.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

Anonymous said...

"race is just a social construct"

There are no social constructs under international laws against genocide. When the Chinese flooded Tibet with non-Tibetans in order to dilute their culture and more easily control them, the UN did not say "sorry, but your race is a social construct we can't help you". When Saadam Hussein flooded Kurdistan full of Iraqi Arabs, the UN did not say "sorry you're just a social construct you don't exist". ONLY WHITE PEOPLE ARE TOLD THAT THEY ARE A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT AND THAT THEY DON'T EXIST.

Anonymous said...

我上網看挪威女性不用男士提手袋,重品,書亦這樣寫,還寫她們男士為她們開門會遭白眼,我心想:做show嗎?

自己拿重物又如何,父權挪威認為女性體力比得上男性嗎?我指運動會分開性別比賽是性別歧視,一男一女挪威人說兩性有physical difference喎!

至於男士就算開門有沒有為女人開門,我都不會給他們白眼,因為我懂尊重人。

Anonymous said...

說白一點,香港民主黨已經變質,向共黨的民建聯看齊。社民連陶君行則陰陽怪氣,親近民主黨。
王丹公開支持社民連的陶君行選立法會議員,結果就是間接幫中共赤化香港。

Anonymous said...

http://fishandhappiness.blogspot.hk/2012/08/blog-post_20.html

鍾祖康印象
我以前沒讀過鍾祖康的著作,只知他是《來生不做中國人》的作者,聽說立場非常偏激;今天終於看了他剛發表的〈多失一片國土多一個逃難之所〉,以下談一談此文給我的壞印象。

鍾祖康說他「敢頂着全世界的唾罵甚至威嚇,和個人經濟上的損失,也死不悔改」地堅持各種反中共、反中國的主張,是因為他「深信自己比絕大多數中國人的思路清晰」,好大的口氣啊!這跟陳雲那種眾人皆醉我獨醒、「香港無人講得出來」的姿態,實是如出一轍,都是自我膨脹的表現。他接著說自己如何「刺中了中共的要害,使其陷於歇斯底里」,簡直是妄想了 --- 你鍾祖康的文字有這麼大的力量嗎?你以為中共要人之中有很多讀過你的文字或聽聞過你的大名嗎?

這篇文章的第二段也令我眉頭一皺:

『「人民有權擺脫暴政」,與「極權國家所統治的人民與領土是越少越好」這些概念,我認為是非常顯淺,也極難批駁的道理,但據我幾十年的觀察,絕大多數中國人對這些概念有極大理解困難,這不得不令我想到陳慶釗博士對漢語學習如何摧殘邏輯能力的研究。』

這陳慶釗博士何許人也,竟研究出「漢語學習會摧殘邏輯能力」這個重大發現?我讀後實在好奇到不得了,立刻到網上搜尋,只找到一個陳慶釗博士有類似的著述,書名是《中國模式 --- 神經經濟學初探》,其中的第五章是〈中國人的思維結構(三)文字與思維〉,討論的想必就是「漢語學習如何摧殘邏輯能力」了。繼續追查一下,終於找到多一點陳慶釗博士的資料,原來他拿的是菲律賓 Bulacan State University 的工商管理博士(PhD in Business Administration)!我不是說工商管理博士不能研究語言和邏輯能力的關係,可是,如果他的研究結果只是由一間專出中文通俗讀物的出版社出版,那應該是沒有經過這一研究範圍內的專家評核,而他自己的博士學位也不是這方面的訓練,那麼,我便會很懷疑他的研究結果,絕不會像鍾祖康談到陳慶釗博士那樣,視他為這方面研究的權威似的。

說到正題,鍾祖康以下這幾句也令人發笑:

「個多世紀前曾極力反抗把香港割讓給英國的中國官員和中國民眾,其後代當中必有人為了追求較文明的生活而要逃難到香港。同理,我也深信,假如他日日本能克服釣魚台的天然環境,使之變為適宜人居的地方,則釣魚台相信也會成為無遠弗屆的中國難民或異見人士的逃難地方。若當年日本在中國的門口就有領土,則康梁於變法失敗後就毋須那麼大費周章才能亡命日本了。」

這段文字是無知加幻想的產物,假如鍾祖康寫這篇文章之前查一查日本的移民政策和難民政策,便會知道日本人如何排拒外人(至少在政策上),即使他仍心存幻想,相信亦不會這樣寫的了。

陳雲曾經如此評價鍾祖康:「事實詳盡,可惜推論欠善,史識畢竟局促,致其文章流於孤憤。」(《難忘香港食與色》,p.112)看來是雖不中亦不遠矣;諷刺的是,陳雲自己的政論亦越來越偏激,說到「流於孤憤」,他與鍾祖康是不遑多讓了。
Posted by W. Wong at 23:43 Labels: 不吐不快

Anonymous said...

「個多世紀前曾極力反抗把香港割讓給英國的中國官員和中國民眾,其後代當中必有人為了追求較文明的生活而要逃難到香港。同理,我也深信,假如他日日本能克服釣魚台的天然環境,使之變為適宜人居的地方,則釣魚台相信也會成為無遠弗屆的中國難民或異見人士的逃難地方。若當年日本在中國的門口就有領土,則康梁於變法失敗後就毋須那麼大費周章才能亡命日本了。」


這段文字是無知加幻想的產物,假如鍾祖康寫這篇文章之前查一查日本的移民政策和難民政策,便會知道日本人如何排拒外人(至少在政策上),即使他仍心存幻想,相信亦不會這樣寫的了。

為何要吸入大量外人?人民有沒有公投過接不接受移民?日本既然存在排外,種族歧視等問題,你的意思是叫日本輸入外來移民來解決排外,種族歧視等問題?幸好日本沒有白人國家那麼接受multiculturalism。

然而,西藏,新彊有大量漢人移民,是genocide。

Anonymous said...

還有,香港存在中港衝突問題,每天輸入150個移民來港可以解決人口擠逼,資源,中港衝突問題?

Anonymous said...

又係喎!點解非洲分裂仲係咁落後呢?
如果人種好,國家自然會好,當然不是絕對

Anonymous said...

補充~~~~
做人老公應有的基本條件:
1愛老婆
2溫柔
3有一定學歷
4被老婆鬧不會發怒,還口
5做所有家務
6會煮飯
7有小孩就負責照顧小孩,老婆負責玩就行了
8工作賺錢,不要讓老婆挨苦,還要給足夠家用老婆
9聽老婆話
10幫老婆搬重物
11幫老婆開門
12懂得讚老婆

挪威女性不愛男性做10與11。如果你跟男友老公去挪威,就表演10與11,並擺出一副自信的樣子!!!要證明10與11不是洪水猛獸!!

Anonymous said...

好!大力支持,除了第 三 條!!!好過落後又愚昧又中國式的三從四德

老婆奴 二十五條

第 一 條
老婆洗澡時要量好水溫,抓 癢 擦 背;不得有貪圖淫欲之行為。
第 二 條
老婆購物時要勇於付款,多 所 鼓 勵;不得有不情不願之行為。
第 三 條
老婆上菜時要讚不絕口,多 吃 幾 碗;不得有偏食挑菜之行為。

-屌,煮飯是老公的責任

第 四 條
老婆睡覺時要炎夏扇風,寒 冬 暖 被;不得有打呼搶被之行為。
第 五 條
老婆給錢時要含淚感激,省 吃 儉 用;不得有奢侈浪費之行為。
第 六 條
老婆無聊時要搏命演出,彩 衣 娛 妻;不得有毫無所謂之行為。
第 七 條
老婆訓誡時要兩手貼緊,立 正 站 好;不得有心不在焉之行為。
第 八 條
老婆犯錯時要引咎自責,自 攬 黑 鍋;不得有連累老婆之行為。
第 九 條
老婆哀傷時要椎心泣血,悲 痛 欲 絕;不得有面露微笑之行為。
第 十 條
老婆晚歸時要耐心等候,歡 顏 以 對;不得有大發雷霆之行為。
第 十一 條
老婆不在時要朝思暮想,守 身 如 玉;不得有偷雞摸狗之行為。
第 十二 條
老婆高興時要張燈結綵,大 肆 慶 祝;不得有潑灑冷水之行為。
第 十三 條
老婆失眠時要徹夜陪伴,幫 忙 數 羊;不得有夢見周公之行為。
第 十四 條
老婆敷臉時要提供方法,以 身 試 法;不得有哈哈大笑之行為。
第 十五 條
老婆唱歌時要如沐春風,讚 嘆 不 已;不得有忍笑不禁之行為。
第 十六 條
老婆生氣時要跪地求饒,懇 求 開 恩;不得有不理不睬之行為。
第 十七 條
老婆打我時要任其蹂躪,謝 主 隆 恩;不得有還手瞪眼之行為。
第 十八 條
老婆考試時要幫忙讀書,圈 畫 重 點;不得有事不關己之行為。
第 十九 條
老婆演講時要不時點頭,深 表 贊 同;不得有順口反駁之行為。
第 二十 條
老婆審問時要發誓賭咒,以 表 忠 誠;不得有漫不經心之行為。
第 二十一 條
老婆開車時要溫言教導,釋 其 緊 張;不得有增其繁擾之行為。
第 二十二 條
老婆親親時要熱情有勁,賣 力 求 好,不得有口齒不分之行為。
第 二十三 條
老婆痛痛時要勤買葡萄,按 時 熱 敷;不得有任其疼痛之行為。
第 二十四 條
老婆臨幸時要予取予求,持 之 以 恆;不得有力不從心之行為。
第 二十五 條
老婆不要時要淚往肚流,自 行 解 決;不得有金錢買賣之行為。

bob said...

Yukman said Wang has received taiwanese money...is he one of us or not?!

Anonymous said...

Today, while I was at work, my sister stole my iPad and tested to
see if it can survive a forty foot drop, just so she can be a youtube sensation.
My apple ipad is now broken and she has 83 views.
I know this is totally off topic but I had to share it with someone!


Here is my web-site - how to get your ex back

 

blogger templates 3 columns